Aspects of Kentish Local History

Home
News & Events
  Publications Archaeological
Fieldwork
Local & Family
History
Information
by Parish


Victoria County History of Kent Vol. 3  1932

Romano-British Kent - Introduction - Page 4

region of forts, fortresses, roads, and garrisons. The army which held it was perhaps 40,000 strong. It counted as one of the chief provincial armies. It was also the predominant element in Roman Britain.
   With this military element, however, we are not here concerned. We only note its existence in the north in order to explain the rarity of Roman military remains in the south. Instead, we have to examine the features of the non-military district, within which Kent lies. They are not sensational. The province of Britain was small, poor, and remote. It did not on the whole attain to the higher developments of culture, of city life, and of commerce, which abounded in more favoured lands—Gaul, or Spain, or Africa. It had, nevertheless, a character of its own.
   In the first place, like all western and central Europe, Britain became Romanised. Sooner or later the natives generally adopted Roman speech and many of the elements of Roman 


Fig. 1   Illustrating the difference in the Roman Occupation of the North and South of Britain

civilization, and the difference between 'Roman' and ‘provincial’ gradually, but completely, vanished. When the Roman rule in Britain ended, about A.D. 410, the so-called Departure of the Romans did not mean what the end of English rule in India or of French rule in Algeria would mean to-day. It was not an emigration of alien officials, soldiers, and traders. Probably it was not an emigration at all. Rome ceased to send to Britain certain high civil and military officials, and withdrew or ceased to reinforce the troops in the island. But these officials were few and the troops had probably by this time come to consist largely of local levies. On the other hand, the gap between Roman and Briton, visible enough in the first century, had become almost obliterated by the fourth century. The country folk in the remoter parts of Britain—and in particular in the military districts—may have continued to speak Celtic throughout the Roman period. That is a problem which needs further investigation. But the townspeople of

Previous Page        Page 4        Next Page     

Back to Introduction     Contents Page

This website is constructed by enthusiastic amateurs. Any errors noticed by other researchers will be gratefully received so 
that we can amend our pages to give as accurate a record as possible. Please send details to localhistory@tedconnell.org.uk