Aspects of Kentish Local History

Home
News & Events
  Publications Archaeological
Fieldwork
Local & Family
History
Information
by Parish
 


Ash next Ridley - Parish Information

The History of Education in the Village of Ash next Ridley, Kent. (1735-1950)
      by N. J. Muller.  An Historical and Sociological Survey

          Press Cuttings of Miss Wright’s dismissal     Page 107

Kentish Times 26/4/1940

    ASH - DISMISSAL OF HEAD MISTRESS.
              K.E.C. TO HOLD ENQUIRY.
Increased education facilities in both evacuation and neutral areas were reported at the meeting of the Kent Education Committee at Maidstone on Monday.
The Chairman, Mr. W.R. Nottidge, presided, supported by the Vice Chairman, Lord Northbourne, and members from North West Kent present were the Revs. S. Morgan and J. W. Wilkinson, Messrs. C.A. Elgood, B.T.Ellis, G.J.Gully, F.P.Hodes, H.N.Storer, A.G.A. Salter and E.R. Blackman.
   Presenting the report of the Elementary Education Sub-Committee, Lord Northbourne, said that education facilities showed a steady progress. In evacuation areas the figures were satisfactory, and on April 15th the number of children receiving full-time instruction was 1,136, half-time 7,173, less than half-time 467, home service and other arrangements 45. Considerable progress had also been made in neutral areas, where full-time attendance on January 1st was 7,524, and was now 22,559; half-time was 11,914 in January and now 4,033; not attending in January 379, and now 26. The number of evacuee children in November 17,483, in January 14.606, and this month 11,498.

ASH HEAD TEACHER’S "DISMISSAL."
INQUIRY TO BE HELD.
Referring to the recent controversy at Ash, the committee reported that the school managers there gave notice to the head teacher on January 26th terminating her engagement on April 30th, up to which date salary would be paid, and informing her that her services would not be required after the Easter holidays. A letter had been received from the Parish Council asking that the services of the head teacher be retained. The committee had confirmed the direction given to the managers, and recommended that their action be approved.
   Lord Northbourne asked permission to withdraw the recommendations, and moved that the matter be referred to the Disciplinary Sub-Committee to confirm the action taken, or to take such action as was deemed desirable.

   Mr. Wilkinson wanted to know whether the lady would have the opportunity of being represented by a member of the National Union of Teachers. Lord Northbourne: Yes if she wishes. Mr. Morgan: Something is due to this woman’s reputation. If she is to go, let her go under a fair sky, unless she deserves a cloudy one. At present she is under a cloud.
  The Chairman of the Disciplinary Sub-Committee would be reported to the Education Committee.
Mr. Morgan: Will it be subject to approval or disapproval by this committee? The Chairman: The proposal of Lord Northbourne gives power to the Disciplinary Sub-Committee to act. Mr. Wilkinson asked the constitution of the committee, and when the Chairman had read out the names Mr. Morgan moved an amendment that the enquiry should be held and the decision reached reported to the K.E.C. for approval or disapproval. Mr. Wilkinson, in seconding, said that he was very anxious about dismissals, and recalled his own experience in Erith in 1911. He had never been told the reason why he was dismissed. There was no teacher on the committee who would understand the difficulties of the head and the staff and the managers.
The Chairman said that Mr. Wilkinson had no right to criticise the constitution of the committee now. It had been functioning for years.
   Mr. Hodes said that it was wrong to talk about dismissal. The lady had reached 60, and her retention was optional. Her length of service had been extended so that she could get the maximum pension. Mr. B.T. Ellis said that at 60 retirement was voluntary and at 65 it was compulsory. Mr. P.L. Wells said that he had received a mass of information from Ash, including a letter from the lady herself, which indicated that she had a case. After further discussion, Mr. Morgan altered his amendment to "that the Disciplinary Sub-Committee be authorised to hold an enquiry into the subject of the dismissal of Miss Wright and to make a recommendation to the K.E.C." Mr. Wilkinson seconded. The amendment was defeated, only four voting for it, and the resolution was then carried with only two dissentients, Messrs. Morgan and Wilkinson.

Previous Page         To Page Listings       Next Page       

Back to Contents Page           Back to Ash next Ridley Researches Introduction

This website is constructed by enthusiastic amateurs. Any errors noticed by other researchers will be to gratefully received so 
that we can amend our pages to give as accurate a record as possible. Please send details too localhistory@tedconnell.org.uk