|
endtun per manum predicte JULIANS, in vita sua, quia est de
dote sua; et, post decessum ipsius JULIANE, per manum predict
REGINALDI, et heredum suorum.
Et pro hoc fine et donacione predictus THOMAS, et
heredes sui, quietum clamaverunt predictis PHILIPPI et LECIE, et heredibus
ipsius LECIE, totum superplusagium de clamio suo. Et pro hoc fine, predictus PHILIPPUS et LECIA dederunt ipsi THOME xij
marcas argenti.
- - - - - - - - - -
Simon de Chelesfeld = Juliana.
Dead 1198
|
1198
|
|
Escollant= Alicia de
Chelesfeld Philip de
Danmartin = Lecia.
Dead 1198 |
Dead
1198
1198
1198
| Eldest daughter
|
Thomas Eseollant.
1198.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-
XXIV— (25)
[1 June 1198, 9 Ric. I.]
No. 2. Division of Simon de Chelesfeld,'s Estate among the
three Coheiresses.
(Philip de Danmartin and Lecia his wife grant to Philip de
Dine, son of
Sarah, daughter of Simon de Chelesfeld, six pounds rent in
Chelesfeld, for
life of Juliana, mother of said Lecia de Ohelesfeld, which after
death of
said Juliana is to revert to said Philip de Danmartin and Lecia
his wife,
and the heirs of said Lecia. The said Philip de Dine and his
heirs, to have
all the land of Elme, which said Juliana has in dower. Moreover,
the said
Philip de Danmartin and Lecia his wife grant to said Philip de
Dine, the
service of one knight, of the fee of John de Godinton, in
Godinton; and
the service of one knight, of the fee of John de Berton, of the
fee of said
Simon. The marriage of Sarah the mother of said Philip de Dine, in
Hecham and Macstone, shall remain to said Philip.1 For this, the
said
Philip de Dine and his heirs quitclaim to Philip de Danmartin and
Lecia his wife, and the heirs of said Lecia, all the surplusage of his
claim; and
the said Philip and Lecia give to Philip de Dine twenty marks.)
Hec est finalis concordia facta in Curia domini Regis
apud Westmonasterium., die Lune prosima post xv dies
Pentecoste, anno regni Regis Racardi nono.
Coram domino H. Cantuariensi Archiepiscopo, Ricardo
Elifieldensi
(continued from page 255 For an extract from an early book of Knights-Fees in Kent,
confirming our identification of these places, see "Addenda," p.
287. See also
remarks at pp. 285, 286.
1 The widow of one who held by Knight-service could
not marry again
|