ancestress; while the touching words of her will, as
well as the constancy of her life during the storms which fell upon her,
help us to fill up a portrait hardly equalled in beauty by that of any
of her contemporaries. But we proceed to note, briefly, the strange
vicissitudes which made her name so memorable, and connected it so
closely, with the annals of her country; first making mention of her
children, through one of whom that connection was made at once so near
and so fatal. Henry, the eldest son of the Duchess, fell at the siege of
Boulogne, less fortunate than his companion in arms, Sir William
Hardres, who (as many here present will remember) escaped in safety from
the scene of that fruitless victory, receiving one of the gates of the
town as the trophy of his bravery and success. The second son, John,
died unmarried—Ambrose, the third, acquired the
Earldom of Warwick—Robert was the famous Earl |
|
of Leicester—Henry was slain at
St. Quinton—Charles died young—Mary
was married to Sir Henry Sydney, and was the mother of the Sir Philip
Sydney of a later and brighter day—and four
other daughters married into the houses of the greater gentry of the
period. I reserve for the last, in this illustrious roll, the name which
is to all of us more familiar than any, that of the Lord Guldeford
Dudley (wrongly called in our popular histories Lord Guilford Dudley);
whose fatal ambition and untimely end connected the name of his mother's
house with the most touching and romantic period of our history. Having
thus placed before your eye the members of that great house, which was
destined so soon to share the fate of the kindred houses of Suffolk and
Somerset, and but for its perpetuation in distant and female lines to be |