Aspects of Kentish Local History

Home
News & Events
  Publications Archaeological
Fieldwork
Local & Family
History
Information
by Parish
 


Archaeologia Cantiana -  Vol. 1  1858   page 10

Archbishop Warham's Letters (1518? to 1528?), (from H. M. State Paper Office)

give up the Chancellorship to his more popular rival Cardinal Wolsey. The Legatine authority of the latter brought him more than once into collision with the Archbishop in ecclesiastical causes, of which traces will be found in the following Letters.1 He died two years after his more eminent and successful rival, August 23, 1532, leaving the Duke of Norfolk one of his executors. 
   Our readers will search in vain among the letters for any confirmation of the ridiculous anecdote retailed by Polydore Vergil, tracing to an undue familiarity on the part of Warham, and the application of the term "brother" in one of his letters to the Cardinal, a violent outbreak of Wolsey's animosity. On the contrary, these letters are as grimly civil as any letters can be. One of them, and one only (No. 22), affords some indication of that crabbedness which has concentrated in popular estimation round Warham's name and fame. His correspondence with Erasmus shows him in somewhat more lively colours. He could unbend his gaunt dignity with this prince of Latin humorists in puns and jokes suited to the walls of Lambeth. In one of his letters to the Archbishop, Erasmus complains that there was in his time a set of  "fellows of such vinegar aspect," who could not tolerate laughter in a respectable quarter; or suffer anything but gravity beneath lawn-sleeves and ermine. "Why (says Erasmus to him on one occasion 2 ) should it be considered derogatory for men in high positions in the State if they refresh their minds with a joke, when fatigued with the cares of office? Jupiter himself, the ' father of gods and men,' laughs in Hesiod." A sentiment so illiberal is fit only for the mouths of unenlightened monks or ascetical friars. And although from the correspondence which is here published we should not be apt to accuse Warham of the sin of punning, or being extra-officially funny, we are tempted to
   1 See No. 8.       2 XII. 57.

Previous Page       Back to Page listings       Next Page        

Back to Volume 1 Contents Page      Back to Archaeologia Cantiana listing

This website is constructed by enthusiastic amateurs. Any errors noticed by other researchers will be to gratefully received so
that we can amend our pages to give as accurate a record as possible. Please send details too localhistory@tedconnell.org.uk