positively to have found its cub. It delights in admiring the beauty of its
form to such an extent that it forgets to pursue those who have taken its
young, and stops where it is as still as a captive beast. It is thus that
the hunters get possession of the cubs."
Physiologus says on this subject: "Take care you are not like the
tiger." And Amos the prophet proclaims that this world is an image of the
forest where the tigers abound, and adjures us to keep watch attentively
over our cub, that is to say, over our soul. For the hunters (i.e., the
devil) lie in wait for us and spy us out. They always have mirrors ready, if
they see a chance to be able to seize our cub. The mirrors are the elaborate
feasts, the great pleasures of the world that we desire; fine clothes,
horses, beautiful women, and all the other objects of sin. It is thus that
the hunters produce an image in the mirror that they throw before man. It is
why every man should consecrate himself to the service of his Creator, for
then no enemy would have any power over the Soul of man, that is to
say, over the cub which he covets."
|
|
The symbolism here speaks for itself, and is typical of what occurs
throughout the Bestiary. Sometimes it takes the form of dogmatic Christian
teaching; sometimes it points the virtues of Christ and his followers, or
condemns his ill-treatment by the Jews and foretells their punishment; or
again is more moral, taking the line that the Devil is always ready with his
wiles and sinners getting into his clutches will be destroyed. The ingenuity
with which the various characteristics of the animals are turned is
marvellous. The monkey carrying its favourite young one in front is the
Devil carrying off sinners whom he loves to hell; the peacock’s beautiful
feathers, on the other hand, denote the Gentile nations coming to Christ,
resplendent with many virtues through His grace.
The feature about the illustration in the French MS. is the wings of the
tiger. In dealing with this subject le Pere Cahier says (Mélanges d’Arehceologie,
vol. ii., p. 141): "Si le copiste n’a point trahi l’auteur en
classant le tigre parmi les serpents, ce serait le seul serpent non pas a
ailes, mais a
|