Aspects of Kentish Local
History
|
Otford & District Archaeological Group (ODAG)
The
Romano-British Cremation Cemetery at Frog Farm, Otford, Kent, in the context
of contemporary funerary practices in South-East England by Clifford P. Ward
1990
Discussion
In order to place the Otford cemetery in context with
other contemporary crematoria it was decided to carry out a limited
comparative analysis with Ospringe, Kent, excavated in the 1920s and
published in detail by Whiting and others in Arch. Cant, and as a report of
the Society of Antiquaries, and also St. Pancras cemetery Chichester,
excavated in 1961 by Down and Rule: published by Chichester Civic Society.
While both are considerably larger in extent (256 and 322 groups
respectively) and both are to some extent overlain with later Roman
inhumations, they do represent settled communities of the first & second
centuries, although the Chichester cemetery served the Roman provincial
centre of Noviomagus Regnensium (Wacher 1983) which was a flourishing town
of perhaps 10,000 souls, while Ospringe still lacks a definitely located
settlement, sizeable, and perhaps roadside, though it must have been,
probably Durolevum, ( Detsicas 1983).
Of Otford’s identity in Roman times there is no evidence
whatsoever. The pie-charts (figures 3-9) can only reflect broad trends, as
different terminology has made close identification of e.g. vessel-types
impossible, and there was a longer period of use of the cemetery at
Chichester, the suggested dating being A.D.70-250.
It is noticeable, however, that common factors arise, e.g. the
similarity in numbers of ancillary vessels per grave at Otford, Ospringe and
St. Pancras are 1.4, 1.7. & 1.7 respectively although St. Pancras has some
10% of groups of seven or more vessels, besides having the greatest
proportion without ancillary vessels, perhaps suggesting a greater variation
of wealth in the town, while flagons comprise 23, 29, 22% of vessels. The
proportion of samian is considerably higher at Otford, 42% against 19% and
10%.
Only a very small proportion of the graves had jewellery and other
metal objects in the selected locations, as observed elsewhere (Black 1987).
In all three cemeteries there appear to have been instances of
pottery vessels deposited without the least trace of bones or urn being
identified. Although it is not impossible that bones were originally
present, it suggests that dedicatory deposits may have been intended,
perhaps in remembrance of people who had died elsewhere.
Again, in the selected cemeteries inter alia instances of glass
discs "being buried" were noted 1, 5, 1, but only at Otford was jewellery
present in the same grave, suggesting that the disc belonged to a woman.
Although no trace of silvering remained, it appears that the discs formed
mirrors, probably being mounted in a wooden or other perishable frame; 5
metal mirrors were identified at Chichester.
At Otford it is noteworthy that of all the urns 10% are of
Richborough sandy reduced ware (Pollard form 86), while 66% are of
Patchgrove ware, of several forms over and above those identified by Pollard
(1988), thus lending weight to the suggestion that Otford was a centre for
the production of Patchgrove pottery (Breen).
All in all, the cemetery and its grave-goods, taken in the context
of provincial life in Roman Britain, reinforces the other evidence, that at
Otford, and possibly embracing the nearby villas, there was a flourishing
community of Romanised Britons who apparently upheld similar religious
customs and enjoyed a standard of living comparable to those in larger
settlements and towns in the South-east. In their domestic environment they
obviously benefited, from the Roman economic community which enabled them to
supplement the locally manufactured pottery with imported fineware.
Acknowledgements.
On behalf of the Otford and District Historical Society Archaeological Group
and myself, I should like to express gratitude to the farmers of Frog Farm,
the late Mrs Booker and her sons Jim and John, for their kind permission to
excavate almost on (or, rather, under) their doorstep and allowing incursion
into their fruit garden; to the members and friends of the Otford and
District Historical Society for their assistance, advice and interest; to
Andrew J. Appleby and David R. Bartlett for supervising the excavation of
the mausoleum; to Guy de la Bedoyere for his evaluation of the samian ware;
to Dr. Grace Simpson for identification of the black samian; and to
Elizabeth, my wife, for her active participation in the practical work, her
patience in accommodating much of the material for far too long, and her
encouragement and assistance in producing this typescript, which has spurred
me on to complete the excavation report (Ward, forthcoming).
Cliff Ward
Frog Farm Site To Frog Farm Cemetery
contents page Bibliography
This website is constructed by
enthusiastic amateurs. Any errors noticed by other researchers will be to
gratefully received
so that we can amend our pages to give as accurate a record as
possible. Please send details too localhistory@tedconnell.org.uk
|