of SS, there is no doubt. The Earl of Arundel charges him with it, and the king thus explains the reason:—
" That soon after the coming of his uncle, when he came
from Spain last into England, he took the collar from
his uncle's neck and put it on his own, vowing to wear
it and use it in sign of good love of his whole heart between
them also, as he did of his other uncles."1 This
affectionate assumption of the collar seems to me to be
altogether inconsistent with the idea that the letter S
was the initial of Senechallus; because the king would
be thus assuming the livery, not so much of a kinsman
as of an officer of his own household; this would have
much the appearance of a degradation, an objection
which would not apply if the letters had any emblematic
or sentimental meaning. I am not aware, either,
that any other example can be produced, of a collar or
other badge of honour bearing the mere initial of the
name of an office.
We now come to Mr. Beltz's conjecture, that the
letter S means " Souvenez," as part of the motto
" Souvenez-vous de moi." Mr. Nichols rejects this interpretation,
because he says that the motto is only heard of
on one occasion. This seems to me to be scarcely a sufficient
ground for rejection; and I am inclined to believe
Mr. Beltz to be right with respect to the word intended
to be signified, whether he be correct or not in
considering it the abbreviation of the motto. The simple
word is sufficiently expressive, and one very likely,
in those times of romance and sentiment, to be adopted
as a motto by itself; and if so, the letter designating
it would not be an unfit substitute for it. There is positive
proof that King Henry used both the word and
the initial on a collar. In the Issue-Roll of the eighth
year of his reign, a goldsmith was paid the large sum
of £385. 6s. 8d "for a collar of gold, worked with
1 Rot. Parl, iii. 313.
|